小幺－陈述管理、博说产品

最近好久每写Blog.是因为迷上了Python。
说实话有两三年没有在具体的项目中写代码了。
但是依然没有忘记自己的程序员出身
一直也没有放弃对新技术的学习
接触Python不算很晚
但是真正拿来用还是最近的事情。
希望Python的爱好者可以一起交流

人类本性的三大怪癖

1：我们对已经拥有的东西总会拥护一些特殊感情，从而产生某种程度的依恋，在出售一件商品的时候，我们总会给出一个高出合理价位的价格，因为这个物品中其实寄托了我们的某种感情。我们总是很难处理那些我们永远都不会再用到的物件，也是这个道理。

2：对于我们已经拥有的物品，我们总是看到我们失去什么，而不是看到从中得到了什么。当你即将失去他的时候，你就开始回忆他跟你度过的美好时光，失去了它，你就失去了这些美好的东西。你很难去考虑，通过交易，您可以获得一处更好的房产或者跑车。

3：我们经产假定别人会采用我们一样的眼光看待我们拥有的事物。例如，我们会考虑房前的小花园可以让您周末和家人一起度过一段美好的烧烤时光，而别人看到的是您家客厅的斑驳的墙壁。

1：运营：解决日常运作及执行面的问题

2：管理：为企业设计组织，制度及流程

3：战略：决定企业长期发展战略及商业模式

4：资本：引入及运用资本，满足股东对投资回报的期望

这四种能力是孙振耀总结的。仔细看来基本涵盖了管理者应该具有的所有能力。当然指的是高层的管理者。这个顺序也很有意思，老孙同志也是经过思量的。基本是从基层到高层这么一个顺序。基层管理者主要完成1.2的工作。70%关注运营，30%关注管理。中层管理者主要完成1.2.3的工作。30%关注运营，50%关注管理，20%关注战略。高层管理者当然是1.2.3.4都需要关注。战略和资本70%，管理和运营30%。

从创业者的角度看，反过来思考问题是一个比较不错的方式。考虑清楚您的资本从哪里来，商业模式是否OK，采用什么样的管理体系。然后再关注执行。

李开复“创新工场”启用chuangxin.cn域名。说明开复准备拿这个域名来服务于中国市场。

中国的早期的互联网企业的域名多使用英文，比如曾经的网易，以及现在的sina,sohu。作为一个主要面向中文用户的中文网站，即使所有受众都是受过高等教育的人群，使用一个中文域名要远好于使用一个英文的域名。

域名作为品牌的一部分，需要为品牌的传播和定位服务。一个容易记忆和理解的域名或者品牌名称都非常有利于产品的定位

看得出现在大部分的互联网企业都明白这一点。

Starting with the book “Groundswell” and continuing now for three years running, we’ve analyzed consumers’ participation in social technologies around the world with a tool called the Social Technographics Profile. The profile puts online people into overlapping groups based on their participation (at least once a month) in a ladder of behaviors, from Inactives, a group that doesn’t participate in social technologies, to Creators, who pen blogs, publish web pages, upload video and photos and write and post stories (see first chart below). We’ve kept the ladder categories consistent to allow us to make comparisons year to year, across ages, genders and geographies. This provides something that’s often sorely lacking in analysis of online social phenomena: perspective.

We just published our third-annual such profile, called “The Broad Reach of Social Technologies,” written by Sean Corcoran with help from our data expert Cynthia Pflaum. The data across North America, Europe and Asia are now publicly available.

The Social Technographics Ladder

The headline: More than four out of five online Americans are active in either creating, participating in or reading some form of social content at least once a month (see second chart).

• In the U.S., social technology Creators and Collectors grew slowly, and Critics didn’t grow at all. Creator activity appeals only to those who like to create or upload content, and regardless of the ease of blogging and YouTube uploading, this doesn’t apply to everybody. You might believe that in the future everybody will be creating or organizing content, but we disagree — it’s a matter of temperament, not technology. As for Critics — those who react to content — that group hasn’t grown at all. Looking deeper into the data, that is a result of a small but actual decrease in the number of people contributing to discussion forums. Why? Probably because much of this activity has been sucked into social-network sites such as Facebook.
• At the same time, Joiner activity exploded, and Spectators became nearly universal. The explosion in Joiners, from 35% to 51% of online Americans, reflects the appeal of Facebook, as both press coverage and invitations from friends suck more of us into social networks. Meanwhile, Spectators — those consuming social content — reached all the way to 73% of online Americans, which should end any remaining skepticism about whether this social thing is real. Soon, with the level of social content being put out there, it will be virtually impossible for an online consumer not to be a Spectator. Marketers, if you’re not doing social-technology applications now, you’re officially behind. We expect a wave of website reorgs and redesigns to include social activity. Looking at the data by age, we now see that participation among those under 35 is nearly universal (less than 10% are Inactives) and even among those 55 and over, about two-thirds are participating. The trend is clear: Soon, if you’re online, you’ll almost certainly be consuming social technologies.

More Than Four in Five U.S. Online Adults Now Participate Socially

A few highlights from data around the world: Europeans continue to adopt these technologies more slowly than Americans, with about 40% Inactives in the countries where we do surveys. The Netherlands and Sweden have the most participation, Italy has the most Creators, and social networks are most popular in the U.K. For more details, see the summary of Rebecca Jennings’ report on social technologies in Europe.

Asian social participation is typically as high as or higher than in the U.S. For example, South Korea, where I’m going next week, has only 9% Inactives and 48% Joiners, as a result of the popular CyWorld social-network site. (The international data are sliced by country, age, and gender. You can even put the data on your own site — we’ve made it embeddable.)

In my travels, I’ve found that marketers have a variety of attitudes about social technologies, ranging from “It’s obvious that they’re growing” to “It’s a flash in the pan.” The point of data like these is to provide a real, solid, objective basis for planning and discussion that goes beyond personal experience. No matter who you market to, and in what country, you need to know what your customers are doing. Figuring that out is the first step.

From:http://adage.com/digitalnext/post?article_id=138618